{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2013-12-02\n📝 Original message:Current rough timeline proposed for 0.9 was end-of-January, IIRC.\n\nOn Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\u003e PPv1 doesn't have any notion of fee unfortunately. I suppose it could be\n\u003e added easily, but we also need to launch the existing feature set.\n\u003e\n\u003e There's code pending review to implement PPv1 in bitcoinj, unfortunately\n\u003e it's currently not passing unit tests and the author can't figure out why. I\n\u003e didn't have time to debug it yet myself. I'm hopeful we can get it working\n\u003e and merged by EOY.\n\u003e\n\u003e It may be time to start talking about timelines for 0.9. I am wondering if\n\u003e floating fees should be broken out of the 0.9 release and launched in a\n\u003e quick 0.10 followup - if that were to be done then I think 0.9 could go to\n\u003e beta relatively soon, like early next year. There have been a lot of\n\u003e improvements already and it'd be a shame to block them all further.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at bitpay.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e \u003e \"The payment protocol at least would need some notion of fee, or\n\u003e\u003e \u003e possibly\n\u003e\u003e \u003e (better?) the ability for a recipient to specify some inputs as well as\n\u003e\u003e \u003e some\n\u003e\u003e \u003e outputs.\"\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e \u003cvendor hat: on\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e BitPay noticed this detail last week.  We were noticing that some\n\u003e\u003e transactions were not even reaching our bitcoind border routers (edge\n\u003e\u003e nodes), due to low/no fees.  That led to a long discussion of all\n\u003e\u003e things fee-related.  SPV fees are a big issue.  Getting\n\u003e\u003e child-pays-for-parent in some form out to miners is another.  Getting\n\u003e\u003e a smart, dynamic fee market Gavin mentions is a big need.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e --\n\u003e\u003e Jeff Garzik\n\u003e\u003e Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist\n\u003e\u003e BitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\n\n\n-- \nJeff Garzik\nBitcoin core developer and open source evangelist\nBitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/"}