{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2018-01-08\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 02:00:17PM +0100, Pavol Rusnak wrote:\n\u003e On 08/01/18 13:45, Peter Todd wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Can you explain _exactly_ what scenario the \"plausible deniability\" feature\n\u003e \u003e refers to?\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e https://doc.satoshilabs.com/trezor-user/advanced_settings.html#multi-passphrase-encryption-hidden-wallets\n\nThis sounds very dangerous. As Gregory Maxwell pointed out, the key derivation\nfunction is weak enough that passphrases could be easily brute forced, at which\npoint the bad guys have cryptographic proof that you tried to lie to them and\ncover up funds.\n\n\nWhat model of human memory are you assuming here? What specifically are you\nassuming is easy to remember, and hard to remember? What psychology research\nbacks up your assumptions?\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 455 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180108/d27b5300/attachment.sig\u003e"}