{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1ts9hljj3l4yrpdxelpqdup3l46lw40fmkhw3rr0feh6s5ml247vqerfl5y","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1ts9hljj3l4yrpdxelpqdup3l46lw40fmkhw3rr0feh6s5ml247vqerfl5y","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-06-18\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA512\n\nOn Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:49:06PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:\n\u003e One reason I keep banging on about *process* and how Wladimir needs to be\n\u003e The Decider is that the current attempt at \"process\" is so vague, not only\n\u003e is it unexplainable, but it's wide open to manipulation.\n\nIt looks as if you entirely missed my point. I'm The Decider for *code issues* regarding Bitcoin Core. Consensus issues should not be considered part of that, they span multiple implementations.\n\nSo I'm *not* the decider for anything that concerns the behavior of the global consensus, and I cannot be, as I have explained in the previous post, and as Sipa explained in his.\n\nSpeaking of process, let me remind you that there is a BIP processs: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0001.mediawiki \n\nIf you think it's not clear enough, which may explain why you did not even attempt to follow it for your block size increase, feel free to make improvements.\n\nWladimir\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG v1\n\niQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVgtAOAAoJEHSBCwEjRsmmLPUH/1ug5pvLz6ptIhvuROclV7Jh\nz0Szk5FOqfg4ejT3nYV5LRV5WNHUGDdFnHZJRFsKYH9B0LFgOlnkc488Qg6hBb+1\nrf5zEF/D2X4MhPIx6GqI++gvhDzdBH2t9yxbU7LVZALo7+wtW+ms5eHHFs8WrU0z\nm7NgiZRen4cpQUiBWHlt0PojmXBVZQNU0CD6ErcOpQXhN8J0sb0l0DuFswQgUqxk\nrrNe3LvKp89xT0kDxyzQts/CeIG/8kQYLwIJ1QQDXvYayj2aHHYMkSEWfDlew3IC\nzQkFgHCTGihGHPFeow+dnuW1DI1l92yPYNDLbxivSam3X+qCAGzUTOWTFE+iprk=\n=tE4K\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----"}