{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1g6vxlp4e0nyhs2dqxxcryztyf5f5hyuaq93nw4r87zcnv0sdsa0qqsl5wd","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1g6vxlp4e0nyhs2dqxxcryztyf5f5hyuaq93nw4r87zcnv0sdsa0qqsl5wd","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2017-09-06\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Is there any reason or use case to keep allowing spendable outputs\n\u003e with null amounts in them?\n\u003e\n\nSomeone could have created a timelocked transaction that depends on a zero\nvalue output.\n\nThis could be protected by requiring a tx version number change.  Only zero\noutputs in the new version would be affected.\n\nI am not sure how strictly people are sticking to that rule though.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170906/ea09555c/attachment.html\u003e"}