{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub105eg2ny7gs448umtlsn4ns4slc5q3se8wpnzhtr22j8sgdrv2q7stlgz5a","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub105eg2ny7gs448umtlsn4ns4slc5q3se8wpnzhtr22j8sgdrv2q7stlgz5a","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-08-20\n📝 Original message:Add:\n\nFor - If everyone agrees an increase is required at some point, The longer\nyou leave it the greater the numbers who have to upgrade\n\nAgainst - Insufficient testing before moving to production ready releases\nsets a bad precedent\n\nOn Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Elliot Olds via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Timón \u003c\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of arguments on\n\u003e\u003e \"each side\" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective.\n\u003e\u003e [...]\n\u003e\u003e Here's the updated both-thread lists:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my personal notes into a site\n\u003e attempting to list all the strongest arguments and counterarguments on the\n\u003e block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed.\n\u003e\n\u003e Here's the site: https://sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/\n\u003e\n\u003e Feedback welcome.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150820/31894e56/attachment.html\u003e"}