{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1sa86gng3pvs3jgyt5majwcrhn8ck5qxgy9pjqxkh79u638cd7dys28y304","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1sa86gng3pvs3jgyt5majwcrhn8ck5qxgy9pjqxkh79u638cd7dys28y304","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2013-10-25\n📝 Original message:Would it make sense to use either fixed length strings or maybe even enums?\n\nOn Oct 25, 2013, at 05:34 PM, Gavin Andresen \u003cgavinandresen at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\nMike Hearn has been lobbying for an \"error\" message in the Bitcoin p2p protocol for years (at least since the \"ban peers if they send us garbage\" denial-of-service mitigation code was pull-requested). This came up again with my proposed \"smartfee\" changes, which would drop low-priority or low-fee transactions.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131026/eeabfe72/attachment.html\u003e"}