{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-04-05\n📝 Original message:I like both DD-MM-YYYY and YYYY-MM-DD. I just dislike MM-DD-YYYY and YYYY-DD-MM.\n\nOn 4/4/14, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at bitpay.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Wladimir \u003claanwj at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e Personally I'd prefer to standardize on ISO 8601 (YYYY-MM-DD) dates as\n\u003e\u003e well.\n\u003e\n\u003e +1 for all-numeric, easily computer parse-able without a lookup table,\n\u003e and naturally sorts correctly in a lexicographic sort.\n\u003e\n\u003e English (or any language) should never be in a date format, on a computer.\n\u003e\n\u003e --\n\u003e Jeff Garzik\n\u003e Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist\n\u003e BitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n\n\n-- \nJorge Timón\n\nhttp://freico.in/"}