{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1f2nxequ09nz44775vv6lkffq2plzqvrqramnk29eddmwcc9z7jys8ms289","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1f2nxequ09nz44775vv6lkffq2plzqvrqramnk29eddmwcc9z7jys8ms289","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2021-03-10\n📝 Original message:LORD HIS EXCELLENCY,\n\nThis isn't different with Taproot either. When you spend a P2SH output you\nreveal the script. In Taproot you reveal the portion of the script that is\nrelevant to allowing you to spend it. There is no value to specifying the\nother possible conditions that could have moved the coins because, after\nall, you aren't invoking those clauses to move the coins. I am showing you\nmy fingertip, and pointing to my finger tip, the palm is not relevant.\n\nKeagan\n\nOn Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 2:11 AM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via\nbitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Good Afternoon,\n\u003e\n\u003e You cannot liken the ability to scrutinise the public ledger to be the\n\u003e same as hiding information, it is like showing your palm while you are\n\u003e pointing at the back of your hand. The advice that I have is P2SH is\n\u003e scrutable once the UTXO is spent. Also, there is no public ledger\n\u003e obfuscation in creating new addresses, there is a plausible reduction in\n\u003e transaction linkage.\n\u003e\n\u003e KING JAMES HRMH\n\u003e Great British Empire\n\u003e\n\u003e Regards,\n\u003e The Australian\n\u003e LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (\u0026 HMRH)\n\u003e of Hougun Manor \u0026 Glencoe \u0026 British Empire\n\u003e MR. Damian A. James Williamson\n\u003e Wills\n\u003e\n\u003e et al.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Willtech\n\u003e www.willtech.com.au\n\u003e www.go-overt.com\n\u003e and other projects\n\u003e\n\u003e earn.com/willtech\n\u003e linkedin.com/in/damianwilliamson\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e m. 0487135719\n\u003e f. +61261470192\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard this\n\u003e email if misdelivered.\n\u003e ------------------------------\n\u003e *From:* bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev-bounces at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e on\n\u003e behalf of Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev \u003c\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\n\u003e *Sent:* Saturday, 6 March 2021 1:04 AM\n\u003e *To:* Bitcoin Protocol Discussion \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\n\u003e *Subject:* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK\n\u003e\n\u003e On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:48 PM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via\n\u003e bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e My concern was that the more complex scripts allow obfuscation of the\n\u003e Pay To address\n\u003e\n\u003e This is no different from options available in P2SH, or from the\n\u003e obfuscation achieved by generating a new address for a payment.\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20210310/9f72b3f9/attachment-0001.html\u003e"}