{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpg","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpg","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-06-15\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Re: anyone who agrees with noted non-programmers Mike\u0026Gavin must be\n\u003e non-technical, stupid, uninformed, etc .... OK, go ahead and show them the\n\u003e error of their ways. Anyone can write blogs.\n\u003e\n\nI worry that if this is the level of care you take with reading and\n(mis)interpreting Adam's messages, that you might not be taking extreme\ncare with evaluating consensus changes, even while tired or sleeping. I\nencourage you to evaluate both messages and source code more carefully,\nespecially in the world of bitcoin. However, this goes for everyone and not\njust you. Specifically, when Adam mentioned your conversations with\nnon-technical people, he did not mean \"Mike has talked with people who have\npossibly not made pull requests to Bitcoin Core, so therefore Mike is a\nnon-programmer\". Communication is difficult and I can understand that, but\nwe really have to be more careful when evaluating each other's messages;\ntechnical miscommunication can be catastrophic in this context. On the\ntopic of whether you are a programmer, I suspect that ever since you built\nCIA.vc we have all known you're a programmer, Mike.\n\n- Bryan\nhttp://heybryan.org/\n1 512 203 0507\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150615/f4ffeedf/attachment.html\u003e"}