{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1k2eekmevs6gg60df75qpjw4a2atmy89vx28c8zqq5jxy64tuzrws39qd6m","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1k2eekmevs6gg60df75qpjw4a2atmy89vx28c8zqq5jxy64tuzrws39qd6m","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA1\n\nOn 04/23/2014 06:15 PM, Peter Todd wrote:\n\n\u003e But I also agree with Gavin that the bitcoin-development email list\n\u003e is a perfectly good place to have these types of discussions. I\n\u003e myself have used it repeatedly to publish ideas specifically due to\n\u003e wide readership and multiple independent archives.\n\nA development list is a great place to decide how to implement a\ntechnical feature, one that feature has been deemed desirable.\n\nThe chief scientist has a platform via which he can publicly announce\nproposed protocol changes. Anyone else could do the same.\n\nThere are conference happening all the time where people can announce\nideas like this, to give time for the community to hear the idea and\ngenerate feedback.\n\nThere is absolutely nothing so urgent about this attack that requires\nthe consensus process to start here, in a place that most Bitcoin\nusers don't even know about and wouldn't even know which search terms\nto apply to look for such a discussion if they did.\n\n\u003e\u003e PS: We don't even know who runs BitUndo. They seem to have lots\n\u003e\u003e of money to spend on web design - I wonder where it came from?\n\u003e \n\u003e Actually we do: Eric Springer\n\u003e \n\u003e See\n\u003e \n\u003e http://www.coindesk.com/double-spending-unconfirmed-transactions-concern-bitcoin/\n\u003e\n\u003e  https://github.com/espringe - joined Feb 11 2010\n\u003e \n\u003e Anyway that's just twitter bootstrap or something; I hear the\n\u003e wizards can pump out a site like that in a few hours.\n\u003e \n\nI stand corrected.\n\n- -- \nSupport online privacy by using email encryption whenever possible.\nLearn how here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bakOKJFtB-k\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)\nComment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/\n\niQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTWARRAAoJECoisBQbQ4v08kkIAKMSSCn9mBCMj6RwWHK6abud\nUlaKOAh4LNAaJ+pIQD103EGH3JE9pzeaDouupTbdIHqb8CxVO3dn9UFXdfkDW1cf\nYsOOfE0N5crfaODd+NU6jjaf5jXOgmT2ibCU3sSjmphDBMstZfrSaCljtyaj290Y\nurnW1pdL5ZA0zLAUjNO2kXSbuHaE3CTz72s4dWsiRBsQLVAD8j5C5o8gxFVeZd7s\nBa4yGtGAsd0HWikUjE2L4G/J8RzbxUrm5w31A4lawkF+SqtJcFiwoxrXX+FVdi/8\nrfAY/l0EBoRrkW+cajcj29eq1eOOIER0Zcu2FzpPc45Xywh9RCh8C3zgWitOvcI=\n=IR+Y\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: 0x1B438BF4.asc\nType: application/pgp-keys\nSize: 21191 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140423/bf90e17d/attachment.bin\u003e"}