{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-09-28\n📝 Original message:\u003e\n\u003e we have NO hard fork mechanism in place that isn't highly prone to\n\u003e systemic consensus failure.\n\u003e\n\nJust use an opcode that isn't currently defined. Done. What about that\nmechanism is prone to failure?\n\nRe: coma. No need for insults. Please read my article and address the\npoints raised there, which, by the way, do not include any mention of SPV\nwallets. Although your belief that SPV wallets are \"inherently insecure\"\nseems needlessly trollish - I certainly would disagree, but it's a\ndifferent debate.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150928/4e00a31e/attachment.html\u003e"}