{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-09-28\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e \u003e 2) Mr. Todd (or somebody) needs to write up a risk/benefit security\n\u003e \u003e tradeoff analysis doo-hickey document and publish it. I'm reasonably\n\u003e \u003e confident that the risks to SPV nodes can be mitigated (e.g. by deploying\n\u003e \u003e mempool-only first, before the soft fork rolls out), but as somebody who\n\u003e \u003e has only been moderately paying attention, BETTER COMMUNICATION is\n\u003e needed.\n\u003e \u003e What should SPV wallet authors be doing right now, if anything? Once the\n\u003e \u003e soft fork starts to roll out or activates, what do miners need to be\n\u003e aware\n\u003e \u003e of? SPV wallet authors?\n\u003e\n\u003e Do you have such a document for your BIP101? That would save me a lot of\n\u003e time, and the need for that kind of document is significantly higher\n\u003e with BIP101 anyway.\n\u003e\n\nHmmm?  When I asked YOU for that kind of security analysis document, you\nsaid you'd see if any of your clients would be willing to let you publish\none you'd done in the past. Then I never heard back from you.\n\nSo, no, I don't have one for BIP 101, but unless you were lying and just\ntrying to add Yet Another Hoop for BIP 101 to jump through, you should\nalready have something to start from.\n\nRE: mempool only: yes, pull-req 5000 satisfies (and that's what I was\nthinking of). There should be a nice, readable blog post explaining to\nother full node implementors and wallet implementors why that was done for\nCore and what they should do to follow 'best practices to be soft-fork\nready.'\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150928/7a494177/attachment-0001.html\u003e"}