{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0n","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0n","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2017-05-12\n📝 Original message:I've written a new BIP draft for OP_CHECKBLOCKVERSION to allow the community \nto put economic pressure on miners to deploy softforks without the extreme of \na UASF.\n\n    https://github.com/luke-jr/bips/blob/bip-cbv/bip-cbv.mediawiki\n\nDue to the potential for miners to maliciously block this softfork, it is \nsuggested that we deploy it using BIP 8 to ensure it eventually activates even \nif encountering hostility.\n\nThis is intended to be an alternative to BIP 8 in the long term.\nIt is NOT intended to make BIP 148 obsolete, given the timeframes involved.\n\nAn implementation is available (based on top of BIP 115's implementation):\n\n   https://github.com/luke-jr/bitcoin/compare/cbah...luke-jr:checkblockversion\n\nLuke"}