{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-01-13\n📝 Original message:\u003e\n\u003e On further reflection, I'm not sure I understand this use case of the\n\u003e payment protocol.  Since a PaymentRequest currently contains the\n\u003e Outputs that specify the addresses to send to, reusing a\n\u003e PaymentRequest like this without using stealth addresses implies\n\u003e address reuse.\n\n\nYes indeed ...... which is why we're talking about extending the protocol\n(in a future version! the first version isn't even out yet!).\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140113/21032b84/attachment.html\u003e"}