{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuq","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuq","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23\n📝 Original message:On 04/23/2014 10:32 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:\n\u003e f) I missed the part where BIP 32 redefined \"account\" to mean \"subwallet\" \n\u003e instead of what has traditionally been called \"account\" in Bitcoin.\n\nAh, okay. The last time I saw Bitcoin-qt it was still using independent\naddresses.\n\n\u003e In that case, single-subwallet wallet software probably needs to have the user \n\u003e provide a subwallet number in addition to the seed.\n\nWhich brings us back to my original complaint that the user can be\nconfused because he doesn't see all his funds.\n\n-- \nBest Regards / S pozdravom,\n\nPavol Rusnak \u003cstick at gk2.sk\u003e"}