{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2022-10-20\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 03:17:51AM +0000, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e \u003e And the\n\u003e \u003e impression I got from the PR review club discussion more seemed like\n\u003e \u003e devs making assumptions about businesses rather than having talked to\n\u003e \u003e them (eg \"[I] think there are fewer and fewer businesses who absolutely\n\u003e \u003e cannot survive without relying on zeroconf. Or at least hope so\").\n\u003e \n\u003e Even I noticed this since I don't recall the developers of the 3 main coinjoin implementations that are claimed to be impacted by opt-in RBF making any remarks.\n\nFYI I personally asked Max Hillebrand from Wasabi about full-rbf last night.\nHe gave me permission to republish our conversation:\n\n    \u003e Hey, I wanted to know if you had any comments on full-rbf re: wasabi?\n\n    Doesn't really affect us, afaik\n    The cj doesn't signal rbf right now\n    And I guess it's a DoS vector if any input double spent will be relayed after successful signing\n    But we have way bigger / cheaper DoS vectors that don't get \"exploited\"\n    So probably doesn't matter\n    Wasabi client handles replacements / reorgs gracefully, so should be alright\n    We don't yet \"use\" rbf in the sense of fee bumping tx, but we should / will eventually\n\nI haven't asked Joinmarket yet. But the impact on their implementation should\nbe very similar.\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 488 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20221020/f687b805/attachment-0001.sig\u003e"}