{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1h0jpmhuc5ufwtzz92ut7erelpzfu2vrfntc2nr97smq27qfckfwsyc9su0","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1h0jpmhuc5ufwtzz92ut7erelpzfu2vrfntc2nr97smq27qfckfwsyc9su0","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-07-10\n📝 Original message:Some miners have voluntarily deployed CPFP.\n\nI had a thread about it earlier this month where some other ideas got\ntossed around.\nhttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-July/009304.html\n\nThe specific pull request to get it into the reference implementation\nis still open based on a merge conflict\nhttps://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/1647\n\nPeter Todd has another thread on RBF which you mentioned earlier\nhttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2014-April/005620.html\n\nThere is also a beautiful example of CPFP in action from Eligius in\nthis transaction:\nhttps://blockchain.info/tx/4cc3e2b6407ae8cdc1fd62cb3235f9c92654277684da8970db19a0169e44c68c\n\nFollow the spent outputs and you will see the person is trying to\nincentive the transaction by upping the fees of dependent\ntransactions.  It set in the mempool until Eligius won a block, then\nit made it into the chain.  CPFP still works, but only in an Eligius\nblock (that I can see).  So it's better than nothing."}