{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-08-11\n📝 Original message:On Aug 11, 2015 12:14 AM, \"Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev\" \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e On Monday 10. August 2015 13.55.03 Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Gavin, I interpret the absence of response to these questions as a\n\u003e \u003e sign that everybody agrees that  there's no other reason to increase\n\u003e \u003e the consensus block size other than to avoid minimum market fees from\n\u003e \u003e rising (above zero).\n\u003e \u003e Feel free to correct that notion at any time by answering the\n\u003e \u003e questions yourself.\n\u003e \u003e In fact if any other \"big block size advocate\" thinks there's more\n\u003e \u003e reason I would like to hear their reasons too.\n\u003e\n\u003e See my various emails in the last hour.\n\nI've read them. I have read gavin's blog posts as well, several times.\nI still don't see what else can we fear from not increasing the size apart\nfrom fees maybe rising and making some problems that need to be solved\nrewardless of the size more visible (like a dumb unbounded mempool design).\n\nThis discussion is frustrating for everyone. I could also say \"This have\nbeen explained many times\" and similar things, but that's not productive.\nI'm not trying to be obstinate, please, answer what else is to fear or\nadmit that all your feas are just potential consequences of rising fees.\n\nWith the risk of sounding condescending or aggressive...Really, is not that\nhard to answer questions directly and succinctly. We should all be friends\nwith clarity. Only fear, uncertainty and doubt are enemies of clarity. But\nyou guys on the \"bigger blocks side\" don't want to spread fud, do you?\nPlease, prove paranoid people like me wrong on this point, for the good of\nthis discussion. I really don't know how else to ask this without getting a\nlink to something I have already read as a response.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150811/560a774e/attachment.html\u003e"}