{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1gymmksd9tgwzc5w33umlx08sc2ggys3v2cucmpvl7yy9720wh49s8dvff7","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1gymmksd9tgwzc5w33umlx08sc2ggys3v2cucmpvl7yy9720wh49s8dvff7","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2022-04-25\n📝 Original message:On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 07:36, ZmnSCPxj \u003cZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com\u003e wrote\n\nCTV *can* benefit layer 2 users, which is why I switched from vaguely\n\u003e apathetic to CTV, to vaguely supportive of it.\n\n\nOther proposals exist that also benefit L2 solutions. What makes you\nsupport CTV specifically?\n\nCentrally documenting the implications of each side by side and point by\npoint might be a useful next step. This would enable a larger part of the\ncommunity to understand each proposal and may reduce repetition and\nmisunderstandings on this list.\n\nOnce a common understanding of the implications of each proposal is in\nplace, their tradeoffs can be considered, facilitating creating consensus\non which proposal benefits a maximum of users.\n\nZac\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220425/8855a181/attachment-0001.html\u003e"}