{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2011-12-18\n🗒️ Summary of this message: Extended URIs allow servers to negotiate payment details, making aliases practical for organizations that trust a CA with their funds.\n📝 Original message:On Sunday, December 18, 2011 6:58:37 PM slush wrote:\n\u003e Maybe I'm retarded, but where's the point in providing alliases containing\n\u003e yet another hash in URL?\n\nThe point of the extended URI is to allow the server to negotiate payment \ndetails (payment/order information, fees, new privacy address, etc) rather \nthan merely sending a simple payment to a single fixed address.\n\nI am not convinced *aliases* are practical, without CA trust. An organization \nthat wants to trust a CA with all their funds can leave off the address \nportion, to provide more human-friendly URIs."}
