{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1evqj5cgattg2fj52v33thxk4rzekq86a8lz603vnsczkxcgnpddsg3evme","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1evqj5cgattg2fj52v33thxk4rzekq86a8lz603vnsczkxcgnpddsg3evme","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2013-11-02\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA1\n\nOn 02.11.2013 19:08, Jeff Garzik wrote:\n\u003e On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Melvin Carvalho \n\u003e \u003cmelvincarvalho at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e Identity need not be a hard problem.  In my view it is a solved\n\u003e\u003e problem.\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e Yes:  https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Identity_protocol_v1\n\u003e \n\nWell in the view of an average internet browser, it is not a solved\nproblem neither does this identity protocol solve it.\n\nBut Mike is correct, this is a wrong place to discuss about it.\n\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\nComment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/\n\niEYEARECAAYFAlJ1M30ACgkQvafo1Ths1SxypQCgor9LQTyKnlr0gByMPPJRQF6U\nLpIAnRMj/udBSDJOK+2JP0hhiG1Bk81d\n=tcpx\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----"}