{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2022-06-12\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 09:02:18AM -0400, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e Maintaining the security of the protocol is squarely the responsibility of\n\u003e the Bitcoin software and the core developers\n\u003e \n\u003e Continued demand for block space is critical for Bitcoin's security.\n\nOnly because the block reward goes away. If it was made to continue\nindefinitely - most likely with an inflation hard fork - demand for block space\nwould not be critical to Bitcoin's security.\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 488 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220611/af80f0d7/attachment.sig\u003e"}