{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m6p5kgcd428x6pxyfege98zjmlwrdhp0gyz6pdnsvrvalscddnxqurdjn5","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m6p5kgcd428x6pxyfege98zjmlwrdhp0gyz6pdnsvrvalscddnxqurdjn5","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-08-23\n📝 Original message:Gerrit is free if you can afford the admin(s) to maintain it.\n\nhttp://code.google.com/p/gerrit/wiki/ShowCases\n\nAnd yes, I'm volunteering to get paid to be the admin, especially if you\nwant a 'painless' log in with a github account feature, because it will\nbe very painful for me to unroll the damage if github is compromised.\n\nMy preference would be that we use the same ECDSA keys we secure our\nbitcoins with to secure our access to the code review and source \ncontrol systems.\n\nOn Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 04:16:11PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:\n\u003e If github were to be abandoned for anything, it'd make sense to move code\n\u003e review and bug tracking elsewhere. GitHub does a reasonably good job of\n\u003e hosting git repositories. It kind of sucks at code review and the issue\n\u003e tracker is rudimentary at best. These days you can do \"log in with my\n\u003e github account\" so if done well, it'd not have to be very painful.\n\u003e \n\u003e JetBrains make great stuff and they have a code review and repository\n\u003e exploration tool called Upsource in development, which should come out\n\u003e soon. I think it's proprietary but that would be no different to github,\n\u003e and it's designed for self hosting.\n\n-- \n----------------------------------------------------------------------------\nTroy Benjegerdes                 'da hozer'                  hozer at hozed.org\n7 elements      earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soul        grid.coop\n\n      Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel,\n         nor try buy a hacker who makes money by the megahash"}