{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Ben Davenport \u003cbendavenport at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e But may I suggest we consider changing the name \"stealth address\" to\n\u003e something more neutral?\n\nACK.  Regardless of the 'political' overtones, I think stealth is a\nlittle cringe-worthy.\n\n\"Private address\" would be fine if not for confusion with private-keys.\n\n\"Static address\" is perhaps the best in my view. (also helps improve\nawareness that normal addresses are intended to be more one-use-ness)"}