{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-06-19\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:37:49PM +0800, Chun Wang wrote:\n\u003e Hello. We recognize the problem. We will switch to FSS RBF soon. Thanks.\n\nNo worries, let me know if you have any issues. You have my phone\nnumber.\n\nWhile my own preference - and a number of other devs - is full-RBF,\neither one is a good step forward for Bitcoin.\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n000000000000000003188926be14e5fbe2f8f9c63c9fb8e2ba4b14ab04f1c9ab\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 650 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150619/801d33e3/attachment.sig\u003e"}