{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2017-09-27\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 01:35:33PM -0600, Chris Priest wrote:\n\u003e A better solution is to just have the sending wallet check to see if the\n\u003e address you are about to send to has been used before. If it's a fresh\n\nMy concern is not primarily people re-using addresses, but rather people using\nstale addresses that the recipient would rather not be used anymore. This\nsituation often happens even if the stale address has never been used.\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 455 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170927/33226c50/attachment-0001.sig\u003e"}