{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxc","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxc","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-01-16\n📝 Original message:On 16 January 2014 00:05, Jeremy Spilman \u003cjeremy at taplink.co\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e  Might I propose \"reusable address\".\n\u003e\n\u003e I think that describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more so\n\u003e encourages wallets to present options as 'one time use' vs 'reusable'.\n\u003e\n\nThe problem is all addresses are reusable and to an average user, addresses\nare already reusable so there is little to distinguish the address format.\nIt might be better to call it a \"public address\" in common terminology.\n\nDrak\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140116/1b92b504/attachment.html\u003e"}