{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2017-04-07\n📝 Original message:On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Tomas via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003eAs this\n\u003e solution, reversing the costs of outputs and inputs, seems to have\n\u003e excellent performance characteristics (as shown in the test results),\n\u003e updates to the protocol addressing the UTXO growth, might not be worth\n\u003e considering *protocol improvements*\n\nI'm still lost on this-- AFAICT your proposals long term resource\nrequirements are directly proportional to the amount of unspent output\ndata, which grows over time at some fraction of the total transaction\nvolume (plus the rate of spending which is more or less a constant).\n\nCan you help out my understanding here?"}