{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-03-11\n📝 Original message:Sure, but I don't see wallets being able to _assume_ _remote_ parties\nhave an HD wallet for a long, long time.  Interoperability common\nsense implies the environment will be heterogenous, perhaps forever,\ninvalidating assume-each-party-uses-HD logic.\n\nOn Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Gavin Andresen \u003cgavinandresen at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at bitpay.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Drak \u003cdrak at zikula.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e \u003e I very much like the idea of assuming each party uses HD wallets, that\n\u003e\u003e \u003e certainly simplifies things greatly.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e It also assumes a reality different from our current one.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Multisig wallets are a different reality from our current one, so when we\n\u003e move to that new reality we should do it correctly from the beginning.\n\u003e\n\u003e --\n\u003e --\n\u003e Gavin Andrese\n\n\n\n-- \nJeff Garzik\nBitcoin core developer and open source evangelist\nBitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/"}