{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1ac86vemj7ce5z8jyxt39rna3tvwql6xd30ha3vxcd6esysp23d9qrlswfj","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1ac86vemj7ce5z8jyxt39rna3tvwql6xd30ha3vxcd6esysp23d9qrlswfj","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-08-07\n📝 Original message:On 7 August 2015 at 22:35, Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e the need an individual has for running a node is a completely different concept than the\n\u003e need for nodes to exist.  And, really, you are describing miners, not nodes.\n\nIt's not as simple as trusting miners, Bitcoin security needs some\nreasonable portion of economic interest to be validating their receipt\nof coins against a full node they run.\n\nI do it myself because I dont want to lose money, as do many power\nusers.  Most bitcoin ecosystem companies do it.  You dont have to run\nit all the time, just sync it when you want to check your own coin\nreceipt with higher assurance.\n\n\u003e As we concluded in our previous email, the need to run a node is inversely\n\u003e proportional to the ability (or willingness) to trust others.\n\nEven if you are willing to trust others, trusting miners or random\nfull nodes would be unsafe if not for the reasonable portion of\neconomic interest validating their own received coins.  That holds\nminers honest, otherwise they could more easily present fake\ninformation to SPV users.\n\n\u003e And lets face it, practically everyone trusts others with their money today.\n\nBitcoin's very reason for existence is to avoid that need.  For people\nfully happy to trust others with their money, Bitcoin may not be as\ninteresting to them.\n\n\u003e\u003e If the impact of the system goes u[p], so should the - joint - incentives to\n\u003e\u003e keep it secure. And I think we're (slowly) failing at that.\n\u003e\n\u003e That is your opinion.\n\nWhat Pieter said is an accurate summary and non-controversial.\n\nAdam"}