{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1uvtfvcegcn9kds68r8he57emc480vqtx8t22kpsctxgjxae44gvsksaxrt","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1uvtfvcegcn9kds68r8he57emc480vqtx8t22kpsctxgjxae44gvsksaxrt","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2018-03-20\n📝 Original message:\nOn 9 March 2018 at 05:28, ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev \u003c\nlightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Good morning Corne,\n\u003e\n\u003e You mention URLs in your draft.  This made me remember about the Web\n\u003e Payments Working Group of W3C, https://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/ , of which\n\u003e Decker, Christian of Blockstream is a member: https://www.w3.org/2000/09/\n\u003e dbwg/details?group=83744\u0026public=1\n\u003e\n\u003e My understanding is that Christian aims to make Bitcoin payments (and\n\u003e possibly Lightning invoice payments?) payable over Web payment protocols\n\u003e that W3C group is working on.\n\u003e\n\u003e Possibly the Web Payments Working Group may provide better perspective on\n\u003e various other payment use cases as well as their subtleties, which can help\n\u003e inform your considerations in your proposed BOLT12.\n\u003e\n\nI'm interested in this effort too.\n\nThere's various levels of web payments incubation.  Working Group is for\nwide deployment in browsers.  Interest Group is for ideas that are aimed at\nstandards track.  Community group is aimed at new ideas and specs which can\nhave stable references, but may be more on the bleeding edge.\n\nI do quite a bit of work with the W3C, so am happy to look over things, as\nI'd like to include something similar in my apps.  I was thinking I'd have\nto make my own ontology, but if it's possible to reuse, that's even better!\n\n\n\u003e\n\u003e Regards,\n\u003e ZmnSCPxj\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e ​Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.​\n\u003e\n\u003e ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐\n\u003e\n\u003e On March 8, 2018 11:19 PM, Corné Plooy via Lightning-dev \u003c\n\u003e lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003e Hi,\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e I was thinking of how to use Lightning for various types of payments,\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e and I think it's currently fine for customer/(web)shop type\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e interactions, but it seems a bit inconvenient for other use cases, e.g.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e salary payments or direct pay-out of cryptocurrency bought on an\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e exchange. I came up with an idea that addresses some of these issues and\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e more (e.g. payee anonymity) by having a direct line of communication\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e between payer and payee instead of BOLT11-style interaction. It's still\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e a bit half-baked, with many details not worked out yet, but you can read\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e it here, and see if you like where this is going:\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e https://github.com/bitonic-cjp/lightning-rfc/blob/\n\u003e payment-protocol/12-payment-protocol.md\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e In true permissionless fashion, I have been so bolD to register bolT #12\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e for my idea.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Please let me know what you think.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e kind regards,\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e CJP\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Lightning-dev mailing list\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Lightning-dev mailing list\n\u003e Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20180320/bf6c51a4/attachment-0001.html\u003e"}