{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-06-12\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 02:26:20PM -0400, Matt Whitlock wrote:\n\u003e On Friday, 12 June 2015, at 11:20 am, Mark Friedenbach wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Peter it's not clear to me that your described protocol is free of miner\n\u003e \u003e influence over the vote, by artificially generating transactions which they\n\u003e \u003e claim in their own blocks\n\u003e \n\u003e Miners could fill their blocks with garbage transactions that agree with their vote, but this wouldn't bring them any real income, as they'd be paying their own money as fees to themselves. To get real income, miners would have to vote in accordance with real users.\n\nExactly. I very explicitly am proposing that we consider giving users a\nmechanism to pay for votes to give them a way to directly influence the\noutcome.\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n0000000000000000127ab1d576dc851f374424f1269c4700ccaba2c42d97e778\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 650 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150612/4c8599eb/attachment.sig\u003e"}