{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-08-06\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA256\n\n\n\nOn 6 August 2015 10:21:54 GMT-04:00, Gavin Andresen via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003eOn Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Pieter Wuille\n\u003e\u003cpieter.wuille at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003ewrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e But you seem to consider that a bad thing. Maybe saying that you're\n\u003e\u003e claiming that this equals Bitcoin failing is an exaggeration, but you\n\u003edo\n\u003e\u003e believe that evolving towards an ecosystem where there is competition\n\u003efor\n\u003e\u003e block space is a bad thing, right?\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003eNo, competition for block space is good.\n\u003e\n\u003eWhat is bad is artificially limiting or centrally controlling the\n\u003esupply of\n\u003ethat space.\n\nIncidentally, why is that competition good? What specific design goal is that competition achieving?\n\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\n\niQE9BAEBCAAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJVw9fn\nAAoJEMCF8hzn9Lnc47AH/idUy2rGlUCBTTU/jDpNjMy5VGYYRawx50lrnGBufvIJ\n8ZbFleI+gbnFCaJiaPF9ZN0mTjFWv7YcFzlwoPam11UfhEYI2Cl1aGha+R7g/18t\n+1256i4Ykg0uEqrX9ITpYyzoBsVMaqsaOGBbJbUUtHoD1V1GCYBYi5JAl1msGjH/\n2o+/Gh7gBB1Ll6SPtgeM1cCudRXA7PJr3WTjkLy8oGKY7lmVsPUfQ7h3OBJMTwa5\nB+i1KTpSWdWyciWk0a3z7cxNfaajd7Pj3jZYoeCzKJdZja7lnB7FzUnaPE3y0wse\nBby6w48R4VeYsVhM+GolvRDVVSQN9XNfRSiRjuMW4Eg=\n=wzhz\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----"}
