{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2022-06-15\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 02:53:58AM +0000, Luke Dashjr wrote:\n\u003e Bitcoin Knots still uses this service bit, FWIW (though due to a bug in some \n\u003e older versions, it wasn't signalled by default). There are probably at least \n\u003e 100 nodes with full RBF already.\n\nRight. However it looks like you do not add NODE_REPLACE_BY_FEE to the list\nreturned by GetDesirableServiceFlags, so those nodes won't preferentially peer\nwith each other.\n\nAlso, if NODE_REPLACE_BY_FEE is added to the desirable service flags, it\nideally needs to be supported by the DNS seeds too. Currently it is not.\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 488 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220614/db13f666/attachment-0001.sig\u003e"}