{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"Galois (npub1rc…fct0w)","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1rcmnvhhnrylm805ynwcnnte8uq8aen6nu7d2e33gwdrqy7fhzgkqwfct0w","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"nostr:npub1pm5z0gmw3wcvl3yreuv8y7q3stz2zmzc4jar4ckhk927qdcwjwuq3txe07 ok if we take certik risks \n\n« Risks associated with BRC-20 tokens encompass protocol vulnerabilities, centralization issues, network congestion and inefficiencies, and the potential for scams. » \n\nProtocol vulnerabilities : patches with clear docs and rules. As long as rules are open anyone can implement and verify with open source indexers. \nCentralization : like mempools? Like @acinq ? \nNetwork congestion : does it mean Bitcoin usage is an issue?? \nPotential for scams : as much as any new techs. Nostr relays can scam. LN nodes can scam. Any internet tech can be used to scam. "}