<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1y22yec0znyzw8qndy5qn5c2wgejkj0k9zsqra7kvrd6cd6896z4qm5taj0</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1y22yec0znyzw8qndy5qn5c2wgejkj0k9zsqra7kvrd6cd6896z4qm5taj0</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2022-07-11&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt;&#xA;&gt; Miners will learn to create anyone-can-spend outputs to bribe other miners&#xA;&gt; to build on their block rather than reorg it.  (Due to the coinbase&#xA;&gt; maturity, this will require some amount of floating capital.)&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;(reward + avg fee) * 144 * 365 (one year) == approximate investment needed&#xA;to reorg the chain for a double-spend attack&#xA;&#xA;in 30 years, assuming fees are still negligible (why wouldn&#39;t they be?&#xA;layer 2 works and layer 3 is coming), that&#39;s only 1200 bitcoin.  not really&#xA;a lot.&#xA;&#xA;there&#39;s only few things that allow that security budget to be ok&#xA;&#xA; - we assume the price goes up a lot&#xA; - we assume transactions get a lot more expensive&#xA; - we don&#39;t care about double-spend attacks for very large transactions&#xA;&#xA;i&#39;d rather engineer block demand than ignore it&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220711/4d93ee87/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>