<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0n</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0n</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-09-18&#xA;📝 Original message:On Friday, September 18, 2015 8:24:50 PM Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev wrote:&#xA;&gt; Google calendar is localised, so it doesn&#39;t matter. The problem with&#xA;&gt; quoting UTC anyway it the meeting times are going to change for those that&#xA;&gt; observe DST. It would be much better to quote an actual timezone of an&#xA;&gt; actual area so it will remain constant, like 1700 CEST, or 0900AM PDT for&#xA;&gt; example. Otherwise when the clocks change, what was a convenient meeting&#xA;&gt; time will become inconvenient for some.&#xA;&#xA;Not everyone does crazy clock-changing. Using such a time system for &#xA;scheduling seems to inconvenience the wrong position. (although perhaps &#xA;arguably better since most people probably use DST) :p&#xA;&#xA;(Aside, if Google Calendar can&#39;t support standard UTC, that sounds like an &#xA;argument against using Google Calendar...)&#xA;&#xA;&gt; Urgh... Can we hardfork time? It&#39;s clearly in need of an upgrade...&#xA;&#xA;Tonal time works nice any consistently. :D&#xA;&#xA;Luke</html></oembed>