<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-08-07&#xA;📝 Original message:On Aug 7, 2015 5:55 PM, &#34;Gavin Andresen&#34; &lt;gavinandresen at gmail.com&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; I think there are multiple reasons to raise the maximum block size, and&#xA;yes, fear of Bad Things Happening as we run up against the 1MB limit is one&#xA;of the reasons.&#xA;&#xA;What are the other reasons?&#xA;&#xA;&gt; I take the opinion of smart engineers who actually do resource planning&#xA;and have seen what happens when networks run out of capacity very seriously.&#xA;&#xA;When &#34;the network runs out of capacity&#34; (when we hit the limit) do we&#xA;expect anything to happen apart from minimum market fees rising (above&#xA;zero)?&#xA;Obviously any consequences of fees rising are included in this concern.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150807/71828dbc/attachment-0001.html&gt;</html></oembed>