<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuq</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuq</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-03-27&#xA;📝 Original message:On 03/27/2014 05:14 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:&#xA;&gt; That said, I&#39;m not convinced about the extra layers. The &#34;cointype&#34; in&#xA;&gt; my opinion isn&#39;t necessary inside the derivation. There is already&#xA;&gt; support (4 bytes!) for magic bytes in the serialized form. Inside&#xA;&#xA;Cointype in path is for separation purposes, not for identification.&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;Best Regards / S pozdravom,&#xA;&#xA;Pavol Rusnak &lt;stick at gk2.sk&gt;</html></oembed>