<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2012-11-27&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt; That hash would then be reported via some secure channel outside of bitcoin&#39;s&#xA;&gt; domain.&#xA;&#xA;OK, I see. I guess that could be a reasonable fallback for the case&#xA;where you have a secure channel.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; I don&#39;t understand what the relevance of multi-factor is to invoices?&#xA;&#xA;Yes, exactly. It&#39;s about paying who you think you&#39;re paying (when you&#xA;confirm on a second uncompromised device).</html></oembed>