<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1rv5ajnhgrc0wq3ulrk6tcjkgsaq8h4rs5rtsvrnklz4j0lw40egqphc5wt</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1rv5ajnhgrc0wq3ulrk6tcjkgsaq8h4rs5rtsvrnklz4j0lw40egqphc5wt</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05&#xA;📝 Original message:On 10/5/2015 6:56 PM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev wrote:&#xA;&gt; There is no development gridlock. Look at the IRC logs for core-dev;&#xA;&#xA;&gt; Please desist from this intellectual dishonesty and toxicity.&#xA;&#xA;A system where anyone can veto a change promotes gridlock.  Most people &#xA;not on the devlpoment team see the block size debate as &#34;gridlock.&#34; &#xA;Much like &#34;spam&#34; &#34;attack&#34; and &#34;decentralized&#34; everyone has their own &#xA;definition so arguing over it is generally pointless.&#xA;&#xA;Russ</html></oembed>