rich1.0npub12p7jzesdg8kxdg8rujr20znnd868fgugczkwh4cyxwa6gnxj5sxsnjs309https://nostr.ae/npub12p7jzesdg8kxdg8rujr20znnd868fgugczkwh4cyxwa6gnxj5sxsnjs309njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2017-09-06 📝 Original message:As long as an unspendable outputs (OP_RETURN outputs for example) with amount=0 are still allowed I don't see it being an issue for anything. On Sep 5, 2017 2:52 PM, "Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev" < bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > This is not a priority, not very important either. > Right now it is possible to create 0-value outputs that are spendable > and thus stay in the utxo (potentially forever). Requiring at least 1 > satoshi per output doesn't really do much against a spam attack to the > utxo, but I think it would be slightly better than the current > situation. > > Is there any reason or use case to keep allowing spendable outputs > with null amounts in them? > > If not, I'm happy to create a BIP with its code, this should be simple. > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170906/83476b7f/attachment.html>