rich1.0npub1j0cee8lvw7v75c0vfsgfpt5xv8qmr3xzhlwpg9lestngmzwu0u9s6u0kjehttps://nostr.ae/npub1j0cee8lvw7v75c0vfsgfpt5xv8qmr3xzhlwpg9lestngmzwu0u9s6u0kjenjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2017-11-02 📝 Original message:You launched the political football by coming here with a verbose 'recommendation'. Without a code submission in form of pull request to the core repo on github this was never a technical discussion. On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 19:53 -0400, Scott Roberts via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Whatever their failings from their previous code or their adversarial > nature, they got this code right and I'm only presenting it as a real > and excellent solution for the impending threat to bitcoin. As a big > core fan, I really wanted to delete the word Cash from my post because > I was afraid someone would turn this technical discussion into a > political football. > > On Nov 2, 2017 7:37 PM, "Gregory Maxwell" <greg at xiph.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Scott Roberts via bitcoin-dev > <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > Bitcoin cash will hard fork on Nov 13 to implement a new > difficulty > > algorithm. Bitcoin itself might need to hard fork to employ > a similar > > algorithm. It's about as good as they come because it > followed the > > > This is the bitcoin development mailing list, not the "give > free > review to the obviously defective proposals of adversarial > competing > systems" mailing list. Your posting is off-topic. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev