<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1ep4j5tjp6cd2774hrx96vh845dwqzhe3z7n3a2a9uxdm2dajqpgscm3rel</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1ep4j5tjp6cd2774hrx96vh845dwqzhe3z7n3a2a9uxdm2dajqpgscm3rel</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2011-12-13&#xA;🗒️ Summary of this message: The proposal suggests using HTTPS for Bitcoin aliases, with the option for a server service, and clarifies the relevant line of code.&#xA;📝 Original message:Maybe I wasn&#39;t clear enough in the document, but this is the intent with the HTTPS proposal.&#xA;&#xA;genjix at foo.org&#xA;&#xA;Contacts https://foo.org/bitcoin-alias/?handle=genjix and the system responds with a bitcoin address. Whether the system gives you a new address from a pool of addresses, or contacts the merchant behind the scenes is implementation defined.&#xA;&#xA;I&#39;ll clarify it later. This is the relevant line:&#xA;&#xA;string strRequestUrl = strDomain + &#34;/bitcoin-alias/?handle=&#34; + pszEncodedNick;&#xA;&#xA;Between HTTPS service and server service, I lean slightly towards HTTPS (automatic encrypted connection, CAs + all benefits of DNS). But still interested in arguments in favour of a server service (daemon answering queries).&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;----- Original Message -----&#xA;From: Gavin Andresen &lt;gavinandresen at gmail.com&gt;&#xA;To: Jorge Timón &lt;timon.elviejo at gmail.com&gt;&#xA;Cc: &#34;bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net&#34; &lt;bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net&gt;&#xA;Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 1:06 PM&#xA;Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: [BIP 15] Aliases&#xA;&#xA;I agree with Mike Hearn and Christian Decker-- paying to&#xA;&#39;somebody at foo.com&#39; should become, behind the scenes, a HTTPS query to&#xA;https://foo.com/something. If you just want to (say) donate to&#xA;eff.org, then paying to &#39;@eff.org&#39; aught to work nicely.&#xA;&#xA;And if namecoin ever takes off you&#39;ll pay to &#39;somebody at foo.bit&#39;.&#xA;&#xA;It seems to me that if it was DNS-based, the address should be&#xA;something like &#39;somebody.bitcoin.foo.com&#39;. But I think it is unlikely&#xA;people will setup and run a custom DNS server just to support bitcoin&#xA;payments.&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;--&#xA;Gavin Andresen&#xA;&#xA;------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xA;Systems Optimization Self Assessment&#xA;Improve efficiency and utilization of IT resources. Drive out cost and &#xA;improve service delivery. Take 5 minutes to use this Systems Optimization &#xA;Self Assessment. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51450054/&#xA;_______________________________________________&#xA;Bitcoin-development mailing list&#xA;Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net&#xA;https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development</html></oembed>