<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1g97v5rt5sguagjk0cetckrhhmr3hded8u4vwe5keqphe7ye9tgfsv323pl</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1g97v5rt5sguagjk0cetckrhhmr3hded8u4vwe5keqphe7ye9tgfsv323pl</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-08-18&#xA;📝 Original message:My interpretation is that he&#39;s saying Satoshi wouldn&#39;t be welcome to return&#xA;as Satoshi, because whatever he did/said would inevitably end up being&#xA;treated with authority, which shouldn&#39;t be the case.&#xA;&#xA;On Tuesday, August 18, 2015, Warren Togami Jr. via bitcoin-dev &lt;&#xA;bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; I honestly don&#39;t understand your position, but I get the sense that you&#xA;&gt; are suggesting Satoshi wouldn&#39;t be welcome to return if he wanted to be&#xA;&gt; active in development again?&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; Warren&#xA;&gt; On Aug 17, 2015 1:38 PM, &#34;Oliver Egginger&#34; &lt;bitcoin at olivere.de&#xA;&gt; &lt;javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;bitcoin at olivere.de&#39;);&gt;&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; Am 17.08.2015 um 21:03 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.:&#xA;&gt;&gt; &gt; This bitcoin-dev list restarted with an empty subscriber list on June&#xA;&gt;&gt; &gt; 21st, 2015.  So whoever posted from satoshi at vistomail.com&#xA;&gt;&gt; &lt;javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;satoshi at vistomail.com&#39;);&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; &gt; &lt;mailto:satoshi at vistomail.com&#xA;&gt;&gt; &lt;javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;satoshi at vistomail.com&#39;);&gt;&gt; subscribed and&#xA;&gt;&gt; verified the address&#xA;&gt;&gt; &gt; recently.  Do you propose that we manually approve new subscribers to&#xA;&gt;&gt; &gt; prevent these kind of &#34;abuses&#34; as you put it?&#xA;&gt;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; I would simply block the creators old email addresses. Easy with&#xA;&gt;&gt; Mailman. I thought that would be a good and easy approach, but maybe I&#39;m&#xA;&gt;&gt; wrong.&#xA;&gt;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; Some believes it is possible that the email could be genuine. Some say&#xA;&gt;&gt; that only the content is important. I have closely followed. An&#xA;&gt;&gt; interesting discussion. Thank you all so far.&#xA;&gt;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; But let&#39;s say the poster would be the real Satoshi. Would we discuss his&#xA;&gt;&gt; posting if he would not claim to be Satoshi? There are a lot of smart&#xA;&gt;&gt; people on this list, which publish occasionally quite useful ideas. But&#xA;&gt;&gt; much of this is hardly the subject of greater discussion. Especially not&#xA;&gt;&gt; when it comes to the blocksize. On this subject almost everything has&#xA;&gt;&gt; been already said. But not yet by everyone. Especially not by Satoshi.&#xA;&gt;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; Satoshi would have a decisive influence on the community. I&#39;m sure. To&#xA;&gt;&gt; say it does not matter who&#39;s talking is maybe genteelly but a little bit&#xA;&gt;&gt; remote from everyday life. Or not? Satoshi is the creator. What he says&#xA;&gt;&gt; is in the newspaper and is perceived by all. If he says it&#39;s okay to do&#xA;&gt;&gt; nothing as long as we stand together, then people have the courage to do&#xA;&gt;&gt; maybe something dangerous or something wrong. Then people only follow&#xA;&gt;&gt; their hearts. Otherwise they follow their fear. It is a paradox of the&#xA;&gt;&gt; human nature that some type of Dictatorship can make you free. I say&#xA;&gt;&gt; some type, not any type. Enough said.&#xA;&gt;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; - oliver&#xA;&gt;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt;&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150818/1cbd3418/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>