rich1.0npub1uvtfvcegcn9kds68r8he57emc480vqtx8t22kpsctxgjxae44gvsksaxrthttps://nostr.ae/npub1uvtfvcegcn9kds68r8he57emc480vqtx8t22kpsctxgjxae44gvsksaxrtnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-09-15 📝 Original message:On 15 September 2014 09:23, Thomas Zander <thomas at thomaszander.se> wrote: > On Sunday 14. September 2014 08.28.27 Peter Todd wrote: > > Do we have any evidence Satoshi ever even had access to that key? Did he > > ever use PGP at all for anything? > > Any and all PGP related howtos will tell you that you should not trust or > sign > a formerly-untrusted PGP (or GPG for that matter) key without seeing that > person in real life, verifying their identity etc. > > I think that kind of disqualifies pgp for identity purposes wrt Satoshi :-) > But I presume that if the key is on bitcoin.org, you can probably infer that the owner of the key and the original owner of bitcoin.org are one and the same ... > > -- > Thomas Zander > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Want excitement? > Manually upgrade your production database. > When you want reliability, choose Perforce > Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140915/bf82a94b/attachment.html>