<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1dmpy2z9v4nr2np0zjs5he433zphdjy8qkxa4xh04xc9d58n0yjes6y809s</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1dmpy2z9v4nr2np0zjs5he433zphdjy8qkxa4xh04xc9d58n0yjes6y809s</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2022-06-16&#xA;📝 Original message:alicexbt wrote:&#xA;&gt; I do not have issues with multiple RBF policies being tried out and full-rbf being one of them. My disagreements are with rationale, lack of basic options in Bitcoin Core to employ/disable different RBF policies and a few arguments made in support for full-rbf. Whether it appears strawman or offtopic on github, there should be a place to share these disagreements.&#xA;&#xA;Bitcoin Core is open source software, where developers open pull&#xA;requests to try to get them merged after review. If you see a &#34;lack of&#xA;basic options&#34; and no one has opened a pull request for it, it may be&#xA;for two reasons. First, it could be that it just doesn&#39;t make sense,&#xA;so no one sees a point in implementing it. Secondly, it may be that it&#xA;isn&#39;t on anyone&#39;s list of priorities. In the second case, you are&#xA;welcome to share your preference once. Moreover, no one is holding you&#xA;back to implement it yourself and suggest a pull request. However,&#xA;repeatedly demanding others to do it for you is not helpful in open&#xA;source software development.&#xA;&#xA;cndm1</html></oembed>