<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1r3san9v5njl6798hvauyu9ntm6r9c7u8s0t65wls58gpfdcvqp5sa48d0u</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1r3san9v5njl6798hvauyu9ntm6r9c7u8s0t65wls58gpfdcvqp5sa48d0u</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-08-11&#xA;📝 Original message:On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev &lt;&#xA;bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; So, while LN is written, rolled out and tested, we need to respond with&#xA;&gt; bigger&#xA;&gt; blocks.  8Mb - 8Gb sounds good to me.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;This is where things diverge. It&#39;s fine to pick a new limit or growth&#xA;trajectory. But defend it with data and reasoned analysis.&#xA;&#xA;Can you at least understand the conservative position here? &#34;1MB sounds&#xA;good to me&#34; is how we got into this mess. We must make sure that we avoid&#xA;making the same mistakes again, creating more or worse problems then we are&#xA;solving.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150810/d52c3f82/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>