<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1tjephawh7fdf6358jufuh5eyxwauzrjqa7qn50pglee4tayc2ntqcjtl6r</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1tjephawh7fdf6358jufuh5eyxwauzrjqa7qn50pglee4tayc2ntqcjtl6r</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-02-09&#xA;📝 Original message:Hello all,&#xA;&#xA;it was something I planned to do since a long time, but with the&#xA;recent related issues popping up, I finally got around to writing a&#xA;BIP about how we can get rid of transaction malleability over time.&#xA;&#xA;The proposed document is here: https://gist.github.com/sipa/8907691&#xA;&#xA;I expect most rules to not be controversial. Maybe rules 1 and 3, as&#xA;they require modifications to wallet software (Bitcoin Core 0.9 and&#xA;BitcoinJ already implement it, though) and potentially invalidate some&#xA;script functionality. However, these new rules remain optional and&#xA;controlled by an nVersion increase.&#xA;&#xA;Comments please!&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;Pieter</html></oembed>