rich1.0npub1r3san9v5njl6798hvauyu9ntm6r9c7u8s0t65wls58gpfdcvqp5sa48d0uhttps://nostr.ae/npub1r3san9v5njl6798hvauyu9ntm6r9c7u8s0t65wls58gpfdcvqp5sa48d0unjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-05-08 📝 Original message:On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Aaron Voisine <voisine at gmail.com> wrote: > This is a clever way to tie block size to fees. > > I would just like to point out though that it still fundamentally is using > hard block size limits to enforce scarcity. Transactions with below market > fees will hang in limbo for days and fail, instead of failing immediately > by not propagating, or seeing degraded, long confirmation times followed by > eventual success. > There are already solutions to this which are waiting to be deployed as default policy to bitcoind, and need to be implemented in other clients: replace-by-fee and child-pays-for-parent. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150508/a030d88b/attachment.html>